• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

UDRP - Domain Name Disputes

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics
You are here: Home / Pendng / Olympic Committee files for UDRP over 1994 registered IOC.com

Olympic Committee files for UDRP over 1994 registered IOC.com

The Canadian Olympic Committee (COC) and The International Olympic Committee (IOC) have jointly filed for a Domain Name Dispute /UDRP over IOC.com as indicated here. Currently the information as to the International Olympic Committee (IOC) has been provided at it’s official website: www.olympic.org/the-ioc and states that:

The IOC is a not-for-profit independent international organisation made up of volunteers. The IOC President presides over all its activities, while the IOC Session and Executive Board are responsible for taking the main decisions for the organisation.

The IOC generates revenue for the Olympic Movement through several major marketing programmes, including the sale of broadcast rights and The Olympic Partner (TOP) programme. More than 90 per cent of this income is redistributed to the wider sporting movement, which means that every day the IOC provides the equivalent of USD 3.4 million to help athletes and sports organisations at all levels around the world.

The action for filing a domain name dispute over three letter domain name (IOC.com) is highly suprizing given that the domain name was registered 26 years back in December 1994. Though the International Olympic Committee (IOC) may be well known since 19th Century when the Olympic Games were first held in 1896 but claiming bad faith over a 3L (three letter) acronym based domain name is kind of impossible, given the UDRP decisions in the recent past.

It has been widely held that three letter words have infinite interpretations and different meanings for such short acronyms. In Banca Monte dei v. Charles Kirkpatrick, WIPO # D2008-0260, the panel highlighted the significance of short-letter expressions that have meanings other than those claimed by the Complainant. In SK Lubricants Americas v. Andrea Sabatini [WIPO # D2015-1566 <ZIC.com>], it was held; “the Panel agrees with the Respondent that three letter acronym of this type is likely to be of general application to many interested parties, and no one party is likely to be able to claim a monopoly on the use of the acronym in all fields of activity.”

Currently the parking page has a “Make an Offer” page with a form inviting offers from the interested buyers. In any case, offering a domain name for sale is not bad faith per se. The Offer for Sale page was put for the first time in year 2018 as per Archive.org. While intially it had some unused page, followed by some news displayed over it and later was redirected to http://app.2rhythms.org/ till 2016. Though, in any case, there has been no reference to the Complainant or it’s activities to prove any Bad Faith use. Though it will be interesting to watch if it would be held as Bad Faith registration since knolwedge of Olympic Committee cannot be ignored, whatever the jurisdiction of the Respondent.

Further important thing that will be required to be considered in this matter if the Complainant has a Trademark for mark IOC and since when. So first such registration is visible within the jurisdicition of Canada, which was a multiclass application covering almost all the Trademark classes, vide Trademark Application No: 903717 dated 1989-02-28 – Applicant Name: Canadian Olympic Committee. Later in 1993 in Switzerland, by Comité International Olympique, vide application no 058431993 dated 1993-04-01.

But obviously it is not a distictive or unique term to grant exclusive rights to the Complainant to use the term. The WIPO Tradenmark Database shows first such many registration since 1975 and 1976 in India. Though in India IOC is more famously referred to as Indian Oil Corporation (IOC), which has official site at IOCL.com.  Even in Canada, there have been atleast another application for the term IOC indicating International Organization for Confirmity, that was applied earlier to Complainant’s application !

In short, it doesn’t seem possible that the Complainant may succeed !


Update: 

The update in the matter is that today on March 29 2021, the status of the case has been changed from Suspended to Terminated… available here.

Further, the new WHOIS information that got updated on March 26 2021, is available here, shows new owner for the said premium domain name <ioc.com> as “International Olympic Committee”. That is, the domain name has been transferred to the International Olympic Committee, though difficult to say, with or without consideration. The WHOIS information is as follows:

Domain: ioc.com
Registrar: Network Solutions, LLC
Registered On: 1994-12-28
Expires On: 2024-12-29
Updated On: 2021-03-26

Name Servers: dns1.olympic.org & dns2.olympic.org

Registrant Contact 
Name: International Olympic Committee
Organization: International Olympic Committee
Street: Chateau de Vidy
City: Lausanne
State: Vaud
Postal Code: 1007
Country: CH
Phone: +41.216216111
Fax: +41.216216216
Email: email@olympic.org

 

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Primary Sidebar

Domain Lawyer Follow

We handle UDRP / Domain disputes as Cylaw Solutions, India... with 5 RDNH wins in 2021. Instagram/ LinkedIN/ Telegram/ ClubHouse - user: DomainLawyer

domainlawyers
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
23 Jun

#UDRP #CAC #TUCON.com (2015) denied. Complainant contends that Respondent only bought #DomainName for speculative purposes and did not transfer to him free of charge. Held Complainant allegations are contradictory and he fails to prove the second element @ https://udrp.adr.eu/adr/decisions/decision.php?dispute_id=104535

Reply on Twitter 1540025680926310403 Retweet on Twitter 1540025680926310403 4 Like on Twitter 1540025680926310403 7 Twitter 1540025680926310403
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
21 Jun

Does a Dominant User Mean a Non-exclusive Domain Name is Off-limits? Check out this week's UDRP Digest! https://www.internetcommerce.org/?p=3226 #UDRP #domains #domainlaw #domainUDRP

Reply on Twitter 1539287579421556736 Retweet on Twitter 1539287579421556736 5 Like on Twitter 1539287579421556736 7 Twitter 1539287579421556736
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
21 Jun

#UDRP http://Pay.com denied. Complainant has rights in #PAYCOM since Feb. 2000. Respondent acquired #Domain in Nov. 2000 and making a bona fide use of as a software platform. Held Respondent cannot have registered or used the domain in bad faith @ https://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1993513.htm

Reply on Twitter 1539146616351096832 Retweet on Twitter 1539146616351096832 2 Like on Twitter 1539146616351096832 7 Twitter 1539146616351096832
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
17 Jun

#UDRP #LOTTOARVONTA.com denied. Held Complainant owns TM for word "lotto" with additional elements, rather its applications for word #LOTTO got rejected due to non-distinctiveness. Keywords mean 'Draw Lottery' in #Finnish, put to use in descriptive sense @ https://udrp.adr.eu/adr/decisions/decision.php?dispute_id=104551

Reply on Twitter 1537790973324820480 Retweet on Twitter 1537790973324820480 2 Like on Twitter 1537790973324820480 5 Twitter 1537790973324820480
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
15 Jun

#UDRP #artmeta.io denied. Complainant is in the process of developing and creating a #metaverse project “ArtMeta”, in which the Respondent collaborated. Held present case essentially describes a business dispute and is not a typical cybersquatting case @
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/dio2022-0018.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1537075621540798466 Retweet on Twitter 1537075621540798466 2 Like on Twitter 1537075621540798466 9 Twitter 1537075621540798466
Load More

Recent Posts

  • International Olympic Committee (IOC) files UDRP over keyword: aoyunhui
  • INDRP/1524: CGI.in v. CGI.com (Complaint denied)
  • Safe-Banking(.com) acquired at premium, lost due to impersonation
  • Pidilite fails to renew domain name Fevicol.com, files UDRP
  • Vogue (Advance Magazine Publishers) lose UDRP against Indian Travel Agency in VogueTravels.com

Recent Comments

  • Davinderpal S Bhatia on Cathay Pacific files UDRP over 25 year old domain Cathay.com

Copyright © 2022 · Powered by WPMart

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics