• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

UDRP - Domain Name Disputes

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics

Pendng

Maharashtra Tourism files for UDRP against deccan-odyssey-india.com

Maharashtra Tourism has filed for UDRP (# D2015-0845) against the Domain name deccan-odyssey-india.com, which is based upon it’s special Deccan Odyssey Luxury Train, which was introduced in 2005.

The offending Domain has the following WHOIS:

Registrant Name: Rahul Sharma
Registrant Organization: Indian Holiday Pvt. Ltd.
Registrant Street: 70 LGF World Trade Centre Barakhamba Lane
Registrant City: New Delhi
Registrant State/Province: Delhi
Registrant Postal Code: 110001
Registrant Country: IN
Registrant Phone: +91.1125686868
Registrant Fax: +91.1125687110
Registrant Email: rahul[@]indianholiday.com

The owner seems to be some Holiday Company Indian Holiday Pvt. Ltd. based in New Delhi and seems to have applied various SEO techniques upon Disputed Domain Name, which makes the said website appears on top in the Google results, when searched for deccan odyssey Train.

There are more such competitive websites like deccanodyssey.com giving tough competition to the official government website http://www.maharashtratourism.gov.in/. Though Deccan Odyssey does not seem to be registered as a Trademark atleast under class 39 (which covers transport) so it would be interesting to see, how the Maharashtra Tourism is planning to satisfy the panel as to the first condition of the UDRP Policy.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3

Primary Sidebar

Domain Lawyer Follow

We handle UDRP / Domain disputes as Cylaw Solutions, India... with 5 RDNH wins in 2021. Instagram/ LinkedIN/ Telegram/ ClubHouse - user: DomainLawyer

domainlawyers
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
23 Jun

#UDRP #CAC #TUCON.com (2015) denied. Complainant contends that Respondent only bought #DomainName for speculative purposes and did not transfer to him free of charge. Held Complainant allegations are contradictory and he fails to prove the second element @ https://udrp.adr.eu/adr/decisions/decision.php?dispute_id=104535

Reply on Twitter 1540025680926310403 Retweet on Twitter 1540025680926310403 4 Like on Twitter 1540025680926310403 7 Twitter 1540025680926310403
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
21 Jun

Does a Dominant User Mean a Non-exclusive Domain Name is Off-limits? Check out this week's UDRP Digest! https://www.internetcommerce.org/?p=3226 #UDRP #domains #domainlaw #domainUDRP

Reply on Twitter 1539287579421556736 Retweet on Twitter 1539287579421556736 5 Like on Twitter 1539287579421556736 7 Twitter 1539287579421556736
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
21 Jun

#UDRP http://Pay.com denied. Complainant has rights in #PAYCOM since Feb. 2000. Respondent acquired #Domain in Nov. 2000 and making a bona fide use of as a software platform. Held Respondent cannot have registered or used the domain in bad faith @ https://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/1993513.htm

Reply on Twitter 1539146616351096832 Retweet on Twitter 1539146616351096832 2 Like on Twitter 1539146616351096832 7 Twitter 1539146616351096832
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
17 Jun

#UDRP #LOTTOARVONTA.com denied. Held Complainant owns TM for word "lotto" with additional elements, rather its applications for word #LOTTO got rejected due to non-distinctiveness. Keywords mean 'Draw Lottery' in #Finnish, put to use in descriptive sense @ https://udrp.adr.eu/adr/decisions/decision.php?dispute_id=104551

Reply on Twitter 1537790973324820480 Retweet on Twitter 1537790973324820480 2 Like on Twitter 1537790973324820480 5 Twitter 1537790973324820480
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
15 Jun

#UDRP #artmeta.io denied. Complainant is in the process of developing and creating a #metaverse project “ArtMeta”, in which the Respondent collaborated. Held present case essentially describes a business dispute and is not a typical cybersquatting case @
https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/dio2022-0018.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1537075621540798466 Retweet on Twitter 1537075621540798466 2 Like on Twitter 1537075621540798466 9 Twitter 1537075621540798466
Load More

Recent Posts

  • International Olympic Committee (IOC) files UDRP over keyword: aoyunhui
  • INDRP/1524: CGI.in v. CGI.com (Complaint denied)
  • Safe-Banking(.com) acquired at premium, lost due to impersonation
  • Pidilite fails to renew domain name Fevicol.com, files UDRP
  • Vogue (Advance Magazine Publishers) lose UDRP against Indian Travel Agency in VogueTravels.com

Recent Comments

  • Davinderpal S Bhatia on Cathay Pacific files UDRP over 25 year old domain Cathay.com

Copyright © 2022 · Powered by WPMart

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics