• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

UDRP - Domain Name Disputes

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics

Pendng

Maharashtra Tourism files for UDRP against deccan-odyssey-india.com

Maharashtra Tourism has filed for UDRP (# D2015-0845) against the Domain name deccan-odyssey-india.com, which is based upon it’s special Deccan Odyssey Luxury Train, which was introduced in 2005.

The offending Domain has the following WHOIS:

Registrant Name: Rahul Sharma
Registrant Organization: Indian Holiday Pvt. Ltd.
Registrant Street: 70 LGF World Trade Centre Barakhamba Lane
Registrant City: New Delhi
Registrant State/Province: Delhi
Registrant Postal Code: 110001
Registrant Country: IN
Registrant Phone: +91.1125686868
Registrant Fax: +91.1125687110
Registrant Email: rahul[@]indianholiday.com

The owner seems to be some Holiday Company Indian Holiday Pvt. Ltd. based in New Delhi and seems to have applied various SEO techniques upon Disputed Domain Name, which makes the said website appears on top in the Google results, when searched for deccan odyssey Train.

There are more such competitive websites like deccanodyssey.com giving tough competition to the official government website http://www.maharashtratourism.gov.in/. Though Deccan Odyssey does not seem to be registered as a Trademark atleast under class 39 (which covers transport) so it would be interesting to see, how the Maharashtra Tourism is planning to satisfy the panel as to the first condition of the UDRP Policy.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Go to page 1
  • Go to page 2
  • Go to page 3

Primary Sidebar

Domain Lawyer Follow

We handle UDRP / Domain Name disputes... had 5 RDNH wins in 2021. DM for more information.

domainlawyers
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
domainarts Nat Cohen @domainarts ·
3 Feb

Once again raising the question of whether the #UDRP is being misused not to remedy cybersquatting but to facilitate the unjustified seizure of valuable domain names. https://twitter.com/DomainNameWire/status/1621562635450994689

DomainNameWire.com @DomainNameWire

http://Fox.org transferred in UDRP, and I have questions https://domainnamewire.com/2023/02/03/fox-org-transferred-in-udrp-and-i-have-questions/

Reply on Twitter 1621568140562817024 Retweet on Twitter 1621568140562817024 6 Like on Twitter 1621568140562817024 14 Twitter 1621568140562817024
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
3 Feb

#UDRP #imetpolanski.com (2017) denied. Complainant is film director, actor, and writer. Held Panel finds that Respondent has successfully demonstrated his #website is for the purposes of criticism or “whistleblowing” and not a pretext for #cybersquatting @ https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/d2022-4360.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1621526575476011008 Retweet on Twitter 1621526575476011008 2 Like on Twitter 1621526575476011008 2 Twitter 1621526575476011008
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
3 Feb

#UDRP #fox.org transfer. No Response filed. Held #trademark is extremely well-known in the United States, the Complainant provides evidence that disputed domain name was utilized in connection with a phishing attempt. Respondent’s use amounts to bad faith. https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/d2022-4600.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1621514285217374210 Retweet on Twitter 1621514285217374210 3 Like on Twitter 1621514285217374210 5 Twitter 1621514285217374210
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
2 Feb

#UDRP #lordadtaylor.com denied. The Registration agreement is in #Chinese, hence Panelist asked Complainant either to translate the Complaint or explain why Respondent is capable of understanding English. Modified Complaint not to the satisfaction of Panel https://www.adrforum.com/domaindecisions/2024794.htm

Reply on Twitter 1621121090985791489 Retweet on Twitter 1621121090985791489 3 Like on Twitter 1621121090985791489 4 Twitter 1621121090985791489
Retweet on Twitter Domain Lawyer Retweeted
icadomains Internet Commerce @icadomains ·
1 Feb

#RDNH #lolo.com. Held weakness in complainant’s case does not alone provide a basis for RDNH, however it was brought in a manner that either knowingly or at least negligently misrepresented the factual matrix surrounding the ownership of the #domain name @ https://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/decisions/pdf/2022/d2022-3621.pdf

Reply on Twitter 1620787271330037760 Retweet on Twitter 1620787271330037760 6 Like on Twitter 1620787271330037760 8 Twitter 1620787271330037760
Load More

Recent Posts

  • RDNH: Erase Tech. V NetReputation (GuaranteedRemoval.com)
  • All Out loses UDRP for AllOutIndia.com WIPO D2022-4063
  • RDNH in , Domain Name investors’ legitimate rights upheld
  • NV5 Geospatial loses to NV4 Geospatial (Domain: NV4geospatial.com)
  • HCCIProtection.com: Complaint denied due to lack of bad faith registration

Recent Comments

  • Davinderpal S Bhatia on Cathay Pacific files UDRP over 25 year old domain Cathay.com

Copyright © 2023 · Powered by WPMart

  • Decision
  • Pendng
  • Statistics